Selasa, 03 Februari 2015

Parallelism

Posted by enji 00.50, under | No comments

Parallelism refers to using elements in sentences that are grammatically similar or identical in structure, sound, meaning or meter. This techniques adds symmetry, effectiveness and balance to the written piece.

Compare the following examples:


  • Lacking parallelism: She likes singing, dancing, and to read.
  • Lacking parallelism: He likes to jog and running.
  • Parallel: She likes singing, dancing and reading.
  • Parallel: She likes to sing, dance, and read.
  • Parallel: He likes to jog and run.
  • Parallel: He likes jogging and running.
In the above example, the first sentence has two gerunds and one infinitive. To make it parallel, the sentence can be written with three gerunds or three infinitives.
  • Lacking parallelism: The boy ran around the yard, jumped over the fence, and down the alley he sprinted.
  • Parallel: The boy ran aroun the yard, jumped over the fence, and sprinted down the alley.
The first nonparallel example, while inelegantly worded, is grammatically correct: "singing", "dancing", and "to read" are all grammatically valid conclusions to "she likes." The second nonparallel example is not grammatically correct: "down the alley he sprinted" is not a grammatically valid conclusion to "the boy".

Argumentation Paragraphs

Posted by enji 00.49, under | No comments

 Voting is Important : What's the Point ?

It's an interesting time, right before a national election. You've got party stalwarts stumping for their candidates, impossible-to-believe undecideds coyly holding out as if torn between two lovers, third-party hopefuls defiant about their "wasted" but passionate votes, and nihilists on the fringe talking conspiracy theories, false equivalency, and the pointlessness of it all. Between Facebook, Twitter, cable TV, talk radio, blogs, and online newspapers and magazines, there's no dearth of coverage on all this rustling around; no way to get out of the loop unless you make a conscious effort to do so or you live in a van down by the river. And even a van can be equipped with Internet.
For those who like their political marching orders nice and easy, it's a simple matter of subscribing to the mandates of their church, family, ethnic group, union, demographic, party, favorite cable channel, or economic class and logging votes accordingly. But for those more independent sorts, the urge to seek education and enlightenment outside the compound is strong... and that's where it gets tricky. Because finding unmuddied political enlightenment in the glut of today's less than neutral media, whatever the medium. 
There's something manically democratic about our ever-expanding media catalogue. And with that deepening glut of content to fill, loud-mouth editors of smash-mouth tabloids, recognized political veterans, and verbose but fairly articulate actors and rock stars, with all their opinions sitting equally, side-by-side, on the same virtual bookshelf. No differentiation is made for gravitas, merit, or expertise, no particular sniff test is applied to the veracity of what's being said and, one can guess, given the responses from the chattering classes, that no particular weight is shifted one way or the other based on qualifications. Hard, then, to ferret out what's worth believing. Particularly when so much of what's being said is contradictory, incendiary, or just plain bleak.
I had a friend once who spouted endlessly about the inescapable web of deceit we all live in as human beings on this earth -- the mysterious Illuminati, the World Bank, the stranglehold of Wall Street, the corruption of all governments -- and once, after a particularly heated diatribe, I asked, "So what am I supposed to do with all that?" It was an honest question. What is a normal, every day sort of person, raising a family, working a job, trying to make something useful of their life, supposed to do with all that apocalyptic information? He had no answers. Because there are none. Even if mad chicanery is actually as systemic as doomsayers would have us believe, we, those not knee-deep in secret societies and global conspiracies, have no knowledge of, hand in, or solutions for the nefarious world potentially existing behind the scrim. We just gotta get the mortgage paid and the kids to school on time.
So what do we do? An election rolls around, we want to fulfill our civic duty, and so we read, research, pay attention, and when we do, we're bombarded with all manner of tugging and pulling from this side or the other, right down to those who suggest it's all so dark there's really no point in voting anyway.

Senin, 02 Februari 2015

persuasive essay

Posted by enji 00.48, under | No comments

Reasons to Use Android

The recent hysteria about iPhone 6 and the new iOS is natural. Every several years, Apple announces new gadgets that promise to be better than those of the previous generation. In fact, changes are rather insignificant, because both older and newer gadgets are equally decent to deal with any tasks common users would want to accomplish. So, there are many people who prefer the alternative paradigm in the world of mobile technologies, and choose gadgets that work on the Android OS, developed by Google. And there exist several solid reasons why gadgets on Android are better than those produced by Apple. Primarily, it is about customization. Being the user of an Android device allows you to customize literally everything, starting from how your operating system looks like (with various unofficial mods) and ending up with third-party software (such as keyboards, widgets, and so on), which is in many cases more advanced and functional than standard Android applications. Moreover, Android users can access advanced functions of their gadgets through the procedure of rooting, which allows them to use their smartphones at 100%. At the same time, Apple devices do not grant their users with wide customization possibilities (What Culture).
Another reason for giving preference to Android is that this operating system lets its users manipulate multimedia files much easier than Apple devices. In fact, if you are an Android user, you can simply drag-and-drop your files into the device’s folder (which is another Android’s advantage), whereas Apple products want you to manage your music with iTunes, and your photos with iPhotos (Business Insider). In general, working with files on Android is also easier, because Google, unlike Apple, grants users access to a device’s filing system.
Pricing is, perhaps, the major reason for choosing Android. If you know for sure what you want from your smartphone or tablet, you can easily find a device that suits your needs without paying more money for unneeded features like advanced CPU, RAM, and so on (Android Authority). Also, applications for Android are cheaper than for iOS, and many of them are free. So, Android-based devices can really help their users save money. Besides, Android devices work great with Google services, such as Disk, Docs, or Maps, and so on.
On the whole, Android OS and devices based on it are a better choice than Apple products, due to being more flexible. It allows wider possibilities for customization, easier management of files, and is in general cheaper than iOS. All the hype for the iPhone might as well be well-orchestrated marketing propaganda.
References
D’Onfro, Jillian. “12 Ways Android Is Still Better Than IOS 7.” Business Insider. Business Insider, Inc, 25 Sept. 2013. Web. 05 Oct. 2014.
“5 Reasons Why Android Is Objectively Better Than IOS (For The Power User).” WhatCulture. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Oct. 2014.
“Top Ten Reasons Android Beats IOS.” Android Authority 10 Reasons Why Android Is Still Better than IOS Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Oct. 2014.

Interpreting Ideas

Posted by enji 00.44, under | No comments

Interpreting Ideas

Interpreting Ideas is a compound sentence is composed of at least two independent clauses. I does not require a dependent clause. The clauses are joined by a coordinating conjunction (with or without a comma), a semicolon that functions as a conjunction, a colon instead of semicolon between two sentences when the second sentence explains or illustrates the first sentence and no coordinating conjunction is being used to connect the sentences, or conjunctive adverb preceded by a semicolon. A conjunction can be used to make a compound sentence. Conjunctions are words such as for, and, nor, but, or, yet,and so (the first letters of which spell "Fan boys"). The use of a comma to separate two independent clauses without the addition of an appropriate conjunction is called a comma splice and is generally considered an error (when used in the English language).

Example:
The phone damaged, so I lost all my contact.

The phone damaged (First simple sentence)
I lost all my contact         (Second simple sentence)
so                                     (joining word/coordinating conjunction)

Minggu, 01 Februari 2015

Compound sentences

Posted by enji 00.42, under | No comments

Compound sentences

So far, we have identified two types of sentence - simple and complex.
The other main type of sentence that a writer may use is called a compound sentence. Compound sentences contain two or more pieces of information and the pieces are linked by connectives. Connectives are words such as:
  • but
  • whereas
  • therefore
Here are three examples of compound sentences with the connectives written in bold:
  • The boys walked down the road and their parents waved from the house.
  • The dog came rushing in so the cat ran upstairs.
  • My friend gave me a lift because it was raining.
One advantage of compound sentences is that a writer can build more detail into their writing. However, one problem is that some writers can get carried away and write long rambling sentences:
My mate came round and said, "Do you want to go out?" and I did so we went to the park and sat around for a bit and then these other girls came over who we knew from school so we started talking to them and then we felt hungry so we...
Did you spot the problem? Remember, care needs to be taken with connectives. Two in a sentence is usually enough, and they don't need to be used in every sentence.

Fragments

Writers sometimes don't use full sentences. Fragments often help to emphasise a point, create drama or show surprise:
  • She looked as carefully as she could, but found nothing. Absolutely nothing.
  • Help! Please help!
  • Imagine this. You're trapped. It's dark. It's cold.

Repetition

Repeating a word or phrase can emphasise a point, or make sure it's fully understood:
His head was drooping as if it weighed a ton, but it was held up by a sharp band around his throat that was almost choking him. He tried to reach up and tear the band away, but there were sharp bands round his wrists as well. He tried to move his feet, but there were more cold, sharp bands around his ankles.
'Urn Burial' - Robert Westall
Westall refers to the bands around Ralph's body four times. This isn't because he couldn't think of another phrase. He is emphasising how tightly Ralph is trapped to create a sense of fear and tension. He also allows us to build up a picture gradually, just like Ralph does as he is regaining consciousness. Bit by bit, both Ralph and the reader realise that every part of him is tied up - there is no chance of escape.

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Tags

asmaul husna

musiq kuh

Blog Archive

cuap


ShoutMix chat widget